Word embeddings have revolutionized the field of natural language processing (NLP) by enabling machines to understand the meaning and context of words. Two of the most popular word embedding algorithms are Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW) and Skip-Gram. While they share the same goal of learning word representations, they differ significantly in their approach, architecture, and applications. In this article, we’ll delve into the differences between CBOW and Skip-Gram, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, and use cases.
Understanding Word Embeddings
Word Embeddings are considered the backbone of NLP as they involve converting text into numerical formats in an effort to capture meaning. Such representations make it possible for the machines to comprehend and analyze linguistic data from human beings. Several approaches for word embedding consist of Word2Vec, GloVe, and FastText which are frequently used for sentence encoding. Out of these, Word2Vec authored by Mikolov and his team of researchers
Google which proposed Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW) and Skip-Gram models. These models have helped bring drastic changes in the domain of text data as they process and analyse it.
- The CBOW and Skip-Gem models were developed to learn the word context and semantic relations from the large textual data effectively. CBOW guess the target word based on its neighboring context words while Skip-Gem guess the context neighbor words based on a target word.
- Due to their simplicity, efficient computation, and high-quality word embeddings they have brought outstanding achievements in the field of NLP.
What is Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW)?
Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW) is a neural network model used for natural language processing tasks, primarily for word embedding. It belongs to the family of neural network architectures called Word2Vec, which aims to represent words in a continuous vector space.
In CBOW, the model predicts the current word based on the context of surrounding words. CBOW predicts the target word from its context. The architecture typically consists of an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer.
- Input Layer: It represents the context words encoded as one-hot vectors.
- Hidden Layer: This layer processes the input and performs non-linear transformations to capture the semantic relationships between words.
- Output Layer: It produces a probability distribution over the vocabulary, with each word assigned a probability of being the target word given its context.
What is Skip-Gram Model?
The Skip-Gram model is another neural network architecture within the Word2Vec framework for generating word embeddings. Unlike Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW), Skip-Gram predicts context words given a target word. It’s designed to learn the representation of a word by predicting the surrounding words in its context.
- Input Layer: It takes a single word (the target word) encoded as a one-hot vector.
- Hidden Layer: This layer transforms the input word into a distributed representation in the hidden layer.
- Output Layer: It predicts the context words (surrounding words) based on the representation learned in the hidden layer.
Key Differences Between CBOW and Skip-Gram
Aspect
|
CBOW (Continuous Bag of Words)
|
Skip-Gram
|
Concept
|
Predicts a target word based on context words.
|
Predicts context words given a target word.
|
Architecture
|
Averages context word vectors to predict the target word.
|
Uses the target word vector to predict multiple context words.
|
Training Process
|
Minimizes cross-entropy loss to predict the target word.
|
Maximizes the likelihood of context words around a target word using techniques like negative sampling or hierarchical softmax.
|
Training Speed
|
Faster due to averaging of context vectors and fewer updates.
|
Slower because it predicts multiple context words, requiring more updates.
|
Performance with Infrequent Words
|
Less effective in representing rare words.
|
More effective, as it captures detailed word-context relationships.
|
Quality of Word Embeddings
|
Produces decent word embeddings, but not as rich as Skip-Gram.
|
Produces higher quality embeddings, capturing subtle semantic nuances.
|
Hyperparameter Sensitivity
|
Less sensitive to hyperparameters compared to Skip-Gram.
|
More sensitive, requiring careful tuning of parameters like learning rate and context window size.
|
Computational Resources
|
Requires fewer resources due to simpler training process.
|
Requires more computational power and memory.
|
Use Cases
|
Suitable for tasks requiring speed over detailed word representations, like text classification and sentiment analysis.
|
Ideal for tasks needing high-quality embeddings and detailed semantic relationships, such as word similarity tasks, named entity recognition, and machine translation.
|
Training Process for CBOW
This training process helps the CBOW model learn meaningful word embeddings that capture the semantic relationships between words based on their contexts in the training corpus.
- Step 1: Data Preprocessing
- Tokenize the corpus.
- Create word embeddings (e.g., Word2Vec).
- Step 2: CBOW Model Architecture
- Initialize input/output layers.
- Define the hidden layer.
- Step 3: Training the CBOW Model, For each word:
- Encode context words into embeddings.
- Average embeddings for the context vector.
- Pass context vector through the network.
- Calculate loss and update weights.
- Repeat for multiple epochs.
- Step 4: Inference with the CBOW Model
- Encode and average context words.
- Pass the context vector through the network to predict the word
Implementation of CBOW: Pseudocode
# Assume we have a simple neural network with one hidden layer
for epoch in range(num_epochs): for context, target in training_data: context_vector = average(word_embeddings[context]) predicted_word = neural_network(context_vector) loss = calculate_loss(predicted_word, target) backpropagate(loss) update_weights()
# Once trained, for inference target_context = ['the', 'quick', 'brown'] context_vector = average(word_embeddings[target_context]) predicted_word = neural_network(context_vector)
Advantages and Disadvantages of CBOW Model
Advantages of CBOW Model
- CBOW is faster to train compared to Skip-gram, especially for large datasets.
- It tends to perform well with frequent words and is useful in scenarios where context matters more than individual word positions.
Disadvantages of CBOW Model
- CBOW might not perform as well as Skip-gram in capturing rare words or phrases.
- It doesn’t preserve word order information, which can be crucial in some applications.
Use Cases and Applications of CBOW
- Word Embeddings: CBOW is widely utilized to make word embeddings which in turn is employed in different NLP applications such as sentiment analysis, machine translation and information retrieval.
- Recommendation Systems: CBOW embeddings can be exploited for understanding words relationship for similarity which is very important in recommendations system to recommend like items or content.
- Text Classification: The result of CBOW can be used as features in the text classification tasks, when the important factor is a context of words.
Training Process for Skip Gram
Step 1: Data Preprocessing
- Tokenize the corpus into individual words.
- Create word embeddings using techniques like Word2Vec.
Step 2: Skip-gram Model Architecture
- Initialize input and output layers.
- Define a hidden layer with a specified number of neurons.
Step 3: Training the Skip-gram Model
For each word w in the training corpus:
- Retrieve context words surrounding ????w within a specified window size.
- For each context word:
- Encode the target word w into its corresponding word embedding.
- Pass the word embedding as input to the neural network.
- Forward propagate through the network to obtain the predicted context word.
- Compare the predicted context word with the actual context word.
- Calculate the loss using a suitable loss function (e.g., cross-entropy).
- Backpropagate the error to update the weights.
- Repeat the process for multiple epochs until convergence.
Step 4: Inference with the Skip-gram Model
- Given a target word, retrieve its word embedding.
- Pass the word embedding through the trained neural network.
- Obtain the predicted context words as the output of the network.
Implementation of Skip Gram: Pseudocode
#Assume we have a simple neural network with one hidden layer
for epoch in range(num_epochs): for target_word, context_words in training_data: for context_word in context_words: target_embedding = word_embeddings[target_word] predicted_context = neural_network(target_embedding) loss = calculate_loss(predicted_context, context_word) backpropagate(loss) update_weights()
# Once trained, for inference target_word = 'apple' target_embedding = word_embeddings[target_word] predicted_contexts = neural_network(target_embedding)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Skip Gram Model
Advantages of Skip Gram Model
- Huge advantage of Skip-Gram is that it is able to perform better with low frequency words because the idea is actually to output as many context words as possible given the target word.
- It preserves word order information, which can be beneficial in tasks where word order matters, such as language translation or sequence generation.
Disadvantages of Skip Gram Model
- Training the Skip-Gram model can be computationally expensive compared to CBOW, especially for large datasets, due to the need to predict multiple context words for each target word.
- Skip-Gram might not perform as well with very frequent words compared to CBOW.
Use-Cases and Applications of Skip Gram Model
- Utilized in different areas of Natural Language Processing such as sentiment analysis, machine interpretation, and information retrieval.
- Semantic Similarity: Skip-Gram embeddings are useful for calculating the semantic relation between two words and such applications include recommendation systems and search engines.
- Text Generation: Skip-Gram embeddings can be effectively used in text generation task to generate meaningful sequences of words to complete the given phrase.
CBOW vs Skip Gram -FAQs
What is the main difference between CBOW and Skip-Gram?
The main difference between CBOW and Skip-Gram is the direction of prediction. CBOW predicts a target word based on its context words, while Skip-Gram predicts context words based on a target word.
Which model is better for rare words?
Skip-Gram is better for rare words, as it is less sensitive to overfitting frequent words and requires less data to achieve good performances.
Which model is faster to train?
CBOW is generally faster to train than Skip-Gram, due to its simpler prediction task.
|